Introduction
Every major rally in Silver revives the same discussion:
“This looks like 1980.”
“This looks like 2011.”
“It must be a blow-off top.”
This article explains why price similarity without structural context is misleading, and what actually matters at market extremes.
Section 1: The Problem with Historical Price Anchoring
-
1980 and 2011 are visually dramatic
-
But:
-
They occurred at different degrees
-
Under different macro and structural conditions
-
-
Price alone does not define a top — structure does
Section 2: What the Monthly Structure Shows
-
Silver has respected a rising channel for decades
-
Long consolidations = energy storage
-
Breakouts from such bases rarely end immediately
-
The recent move cleared a multi-decade resistance zone
This is not exhaustion — this is expansion.
Section 3: Momentum Is Not a Timing Tool
-
High RSI ≠ immediate reversal
-
In impulsive regimes:
-
RSI stays elevated for extended periods
-
-
Tops form when:
-
Momentum diverges
-
Structure breaks
-
Follow-through confirms
-
None of these are confirmed yet.
Section 4: What Would Actually Signal a Major Top
Watch for:
-
Clear 5-wave completion at higher degree
-
Monthly bearish divergence
-
Breakdown of rising channel
-
Impulsive decline, not overlap
Until then:
Volatility ≠ reversal
Conclusion
Silver is not topping because it “looks high.”
Markets turn when structure ends, not when fear begins.
Structure remains intact.
Educational view | Structure-based analysis | No predictions
Silver #ElliottWave #MarketStructure #Commodities #TechnicalAnalysis #XAGUSD

No comments :
Post a Comment
Thanks for your Comment.
Arockia.